Health Care Reform Mantra

Update: I swear I wrote this BEFORE I saw Howard Dean say basically the same thing on TRMS tonight. Programming Note: Dean will host Countdown Tuesday-Wednesday. Nice.

Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform. Without a public option, it’s not reform.

Yet Another Matter of Choice

I’ve been on fire lately about choice. Sorry about that. A man gets gunned down for practicing a legal medical procedure and I tend to be shot out of a cannon. Gives a whole new meaning to the phrase “what’s the matter with Kansas?” that’s for sure. It has, at least, spurred me on to reread Marian Faux’s awesome history, ROE v. Wade – The Untold Story of the Landmark Supreme Court Decision That Made Abortion Legal. Not only a sometimes painfully detailed history but a great story about how one went about making one’s bones in Washington circa 1970.

But there’s another choice that this country is threatening to withhold from its people, and it’s absolutely absurd. I am, of course, talking about some lawmakers’ insistence on withholding from you and me the choice to participate in a public health care plan.

It’s so outrageous to hear guys like Mitch McConnell stand up on the floor of the Senate and just tell you bald-faced bullshit lies, lies that don’t even make sense on their face if you give them one ounce of thought.

Americans want health care reform. But they don’t want reform that destroys what’s good about American health care in the process. They don’t want a government bureaucrat making arbitrary decisions about which drugs they or their loved ones can or cannot take to treat an illness. And they don’t want to be told they have to give up the care they have.

But if that bureaucrat works for an HMO, such bureaucratic heavy-handedness is perfectly all right.

Americans don’t want a government-run health plan.

Perhaps not when you put it like that, Mitchie. But here’s what they do want (myself included):

While the American people support a single payer health insurance system by only a 49%-47% margin (but up from 46%-53% opposed in December), a substantial majority, 67%, support the public option now under consideration. And a whopping 79% favor extending Medicare to those between the ages of 55-64 who do not have health insurance.

McConnell’s argument is the same old tired one from the bad old days of Harry and Louise. They intend to win this debate the same way they did then, to construct an abominable straw-man and to swat at it mercilessly. The fact is that inclusion of a public plan is an expansion of choice. The people who want to deny you choice are those who are working against a public plan. Ironically, the choice they want to deny us is the very choice that they get to benefit from, a publicly-funded health care system. If such a system is so bloody awful, then why don’t all the legislators denounce it publicly and buy themselves some coverage in the free market from State Farm or whatever?

This is messed up right here. Kos has put together a nice call list, and I’m fixing to call Mark Warner right now. Any health care reform that doesn’t include some sort of public option is just more of the same old bullshit.

What's Really Wrong With Health Care

Today is a busy day. First, I have to properly diagnose the health care issue since nobody in the punditocracy is doing it correctly. Second, I owe a big Johnny Cash welcome to Concerned Women for America.

First. I watched The Ed Show eagerly last night, and Ed dealt with it pretty well. They talked about the exclusion of single-payer advocates from recent congressional hearings. They talked about single-payer and its benefits and its foibles. They talked about a public system. But they didn’t address the real issue with health care.

The real issue with health care is that coverage is tethered to a full-time job. Fix that, and you might have something.

Here. Read it in Slate. (In fact, read the entire article. It’s a good history.)

The success of the Blues persuaded commercial insurers, who initially considered medicine an unpromising market, to enter the field. Private insurers accelerated these efforts in the 1940s when businesses, seeking ways to get around wartime wage controls, began to compete for labor by offering health insurance. If government regulators had thought to freeze fringe benefits along with wages, we might have avoided making the workplace primarily responsible for supplying health insurance, a role that most people now agree was ill-advised.

America is supposed to be a nation of free-market entrepreneurial daredevils, a place where somebody with enough acumen can turn a lemonade stand into a million bucks. But that’s not a reality in this America, which has become a virtual feudal state thanks mostly in part to the practice of tethering health coverage to a 40-hour-per-week vocation. I for one think the best way to address this problem and to stone the other bird of an increasingly bankrupt system is to expand Medicare coverage and allow it to compete with these corporate insurance a-holes. However, I don’t really give a crap how it’s done. Just find a way for people to get coverage apart from a full-time job without paying double or triple via COBRA, and you’ll really have something, including a more entrepreneurial America, an easier time for folks who are now just pre-retirement or who are considering semi-retirement, and a population not in danger of getting thrown out of coverage in the event of an economic downturn. Divorce health coverage from full employment. Period. There’s your health care reform right there.

Now. On to the Concerned Women for America, who for my money has the worst made-up NGO name in Washington. Are you women who are concerned for America, or are you concerned women who are generally in favor of America? Which is it, you idiots? Which?

Anyway, regardless. Let’s give these morons a big Johnny Cash welcome, shall we?

See, the CWA didn’t like the way President Obama recognized the “National Day of Prayer” yesterday because he recognized it like every Preznit prior to the Immediate Past and Utter Failure Dickwad did: He signed a proclamation—which is really more than any Preznit ought to do at all—instead of patronizing the day by inviting all kinds of Jesus freaks to the White House and kissing their fat, (generally) white asses, as did the Torturer in Chief. Here. Why don’t we let the Corporate News Network explain it to you.

Nah. Let’s let Rachel Maddow and Rev. Gaddy tell you instead.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

This “Concerned Women for America” may be the most misguided, foolish, assclown NGO in D.C. May their poop come to life and give them a kiss.